Friday, 19 June 2009

Education - The bigger picture

Home educators are quite rightly up in arms over the recent review carried out by Graham Badman and used by Ed Balls to justify imposition of draconian measures for monitoring and control over how parents will be permitted to educate their children.

However, I've had a nagging feeling that this is part of a divide and conquer strategy that seeks to ensure that ALL children are indoctrinated according to the policies of the state regardless of the culture and beliefs of the family.

I now read about the 'apprenticeships, skills, children and learning bill' which gives 153 instances of new powers to Ed Balls and John Denham as the two secretaries of state in the bill's sponsoring departments.

Whilst politicians are paying lipservice to voters by promising devolution of power from the centre to the people, this bill gives central government more control than ever before over what and how our children are allowed to learn.

The bill gives the secretary of state the right to define, for example:-

the content of certificates for apprenticeships

to stipulate which courses, other than maths, English and ICT, students aged 16 to 19 should be entitled to study

to direct a local authority to "provide information about accountable resources held, received or expended" by its schools

to specify the maximum amount of compensation that an employee is entitled to should his or her employer be found by an employment tribunal to have illegally denied him or her the right to training

to stipulate, for qualifications for young people aged 19 or over, the minimum level of attainment in literacy and numeracy needed "to operate effectively in day-to-day life".

the power to set "minimum requirements" for qualifications including, potentially, the ability to specify which textbooks pupils study.

It gives 22 powers to the secretary of state in relation to a new quango, the Young People's Learning Agency for England, including the right to direct its actions, and 32 similar ones relating to the Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency, which is to replace the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

Ofqual supervision

Even Ofqual, which is being set up to be independent of ministers and will report to parliament, will have to be aware of 15 powers given to Balls and his successors in relation to its work. These include the ability of the secretary of state "to direct areas of government policy to which Ofqual must have regard in performing its functions" and to appoint the first chief executive.

Ed Balls will be able to direct local authorities to issue "warning notices" if he believes standards are unacceptably low, to replace governing bodies and even to intervene when local authorities are deemed unlikely to be effective in improving schools "which may in the future be low-performing" (not necessarily low performaing now but may do so in the future!).


Never before have politicians had so much power, not only to deal with current issues but increasingly to determine that there may be a FUTURE problem and wade in to deal with it as they see fit. Sounds increasingly like Orwells concept of 'mind crime' with big brother overseeing everything we do, say or even think!

We have to oppose these efforts to micro manage our lives and take away our freedom to live our lives or even to think 'wrong thoughts'.


READ MORE at:-

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/jun/02/education-bill-ed-balls
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/feb/25/schools.edballs
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/mortarboard/2009/mar/13/lords-balls-red-tape

Health and Safety Madness

A poll by Teacher's TV has revealed some of the insane rules imposed in schools in the interest on "Health & Safety".

One of the craziest is one school requiring its pupils to wear safety goggles before handling Blue Tack, others include:-

Teachers barred from sending troublesome pupils to standin the corridor as this is a fire risk.
The three legged race is banned as "too dangerous"
No footballs in the playground
Shaving foam is not allowed to be used in art projects in case pupils drown in it.
Egg boxes cannot be used for art projects in case children catch salmonella.

Is there no common sense left in this country?

Read more at:-

http://www.teachers.tv/node/35404


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1194055/Pupils-wear-goggles-handle-Blu-Tack-health-safety-reaches-ridiculous-new-heights.html

Is this Britain or Stalinist Russia?

If you read this quote:-

"If a family wishes to cremate their loved one in anything other than a shroud, the funeral director should contact bereavement services so this can be discussed to clarify what type of garments the family wish to use."

You might be forgiven for thinking that it applies to some communist dictatorship and is not something you need be concerned by.

In fact, the quote comes from Kirklees council who claim to be concerned about emissions from the cremation of the deceased, thus, if you wish to see your father or son cremated wearing his favourite football strip or your child taking her favourite teddybear on their last journey you are likely to be 'refused permission'.

How dare these jumped up little Hitlers interfere in our most personal and private matters in this way, how much pollution do they really think clothes or a soft toy are going to create especially when compared to thematerials used to make the coffin in the first place. This is gross intrusion to deal with a tiny problem with emissions, how sad that our council employees are taking this opportunity to bully families at their most vulnerable.

Read:-

Ken Frost's comments at http://nannyknowsbest.blogspot.com/2009/06/nanny-bans-clothes.html

The Daily Mail at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1193306/I-wouldnt-seen-dead-Council-forces-relatives-cremate-loved-ones-anti-pollution-eco-shrouds.html